Talk:Space policy

A fact from Space policy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that space policy concerns not only a country's civilian space program, but also its policy on both military use and commercial use of outer space?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/February.

Wikipedia

Spaceflight High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

We need to include the Soviet Union

The Soviet Union, even though now defunct, was obviously a major player in the Space Race and the start of the "Space Age" (maybe a forgotten or over-used term now). It was governed quite differently from the current Russian Federation, therefore its space policy process had to be different, so it can't be bundled in with Russia. Notwithstanding that we don't currently have any information on its space policy process, so I've placed an expand-section template. JustinTime55 (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Focus on space policy

Notice how we define space policy in the lead:

Space policy is a country's political decision-making process for, and application of, public policy regarding spaceflight and uses of outer space, ...

Notice the Chinese, Russian (and Ukraine) entries don't say much if anything about the political decision-making process, focusing instead about specific space programs (or in the case of China, declarations of intent by the state agency. Simply listing the programs isn't a sufficient substitute for the political process. And notice, the Soviet section is blank. The European section is so-so; at least it doesn't focus on space programs, but could use more info on the process.

Lack of focus caused by failure to understand the essence of the topic (or to cover the fact we don't know much else) is a sign of ameturish or inept writing.

We seem to have the best handle on the US policy, given the US's open society, democratic form of government. One would expect we could get smilar insight for Europe, Russia and Ukraine, which are (supposedly) democracies now as well. We seem to have virtually no insight into the policy workings of the Soviet Union or China, which were / are totalitarian dictatorships. It would be nice to replace the expand-section template (and augment the China section) with space policy information as we define it. It's embarrassing and self-conscious to write in essence, "There must be verifiable information about this somewhere, but we don't know how to find reliable sources." What to do? Expert help needed? JustinTime55 (talk) 14:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Space policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051222024152/http://tech.tom.com/1121/1122/2005916-250955.html to http://tech.tom.com/1121/1122/2005916-250955.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Space policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Five or six international treaties?

As far as I can tell, the Partial Test Ban Treaty has been subsumed by the Outer Space Treaty, at least insofar as outer space is concerned. If so, should it be removed from this article? It could instead be kept for historical interest, but the difference should be made clear. E.g., it doesn't seem accurate to say that "There are currently six treaties that make up the body of international space law" or "International space law consists of six international treaties" if the sixth is redundant (admittedly I did just change that first line from "five" to "six" for consistency's sake, but I didn't want to be too heavy-handed and just get rid of the PTBT). Tumnal (talk) 15:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]